Turning Danger into Performance – Late Bourgeois Libido-Economy

“You cannot shoot books.” Amos Oz

*

Freud discovers in the Viennese salons that the repressed returns to the surface as “hysteria.” The pathologization of woman serves man. He is able to register his sexuality as “healthy,” while woman carries the burden of the repressed neurosis of the entire system.

*

Today, the phenomenon is interpreted as economic and sexual self-empowerment. Woman controls the code, the camera, and the payment. Yet the mechanics of desire still reproduce the same old asymmetry at their core. The male gaze is exculpated through the argument that it merely consumes because woman now appears to stage transgression voluntarily and entrepreneurially.

Meta-Management

Every time we believe we have deconstructed male dominance, it has already smuggled itself one level higher, parodied the critique, swallowed it, and regurgitated it as a new layer of sublimation. Patriarchy is an elastic learning system.

Whenever we examine the deeper folds of domination, we encounter mechanisms through which the system absorbs its own dismantling as a luxury commodity. The modern patriarch — the “curator of intensity” — is no longer disturbed by exposure. He applauds deconstruction. He appropriates feminist and psychoanalytic critique, refines his vocabulary, and uses critique itself as a more sophisticated framing device. The patriarchal script becomes hyper-self-aware. It now produces films and essays about its own toxicity. Yet the agency that formulates, films, and distributes this self-critique remains unchanged. Reflection upon violence becomes the ultimate and purest form of domination.

Late Bourgeois Libido-Economy

The Italian cinema of the 1970s is often reduced in critical reception to a calculated play with eroticism: voyeurism, domesticated transgression, male fantasy disguised as popular entertainment. Films starring Laura Antonelli are frequently dismissed as mere products of a late bourgeois libido-economy packaging its own obsessions as harmless comedy. Such readings underestimate the metaphysical tension operating within the “Laura films.”

Eroticism functions as atmospheric condensation. Desire appears as an often barely perceptible disturbance within a functional order. I recognize here a proximity to the obscene philosophy of Georges Bataille.

Bataille understands bourgeois society as the realm of the profane: a sphere of utility, regulated procedures, moral economy, and controlled energies. The modern household is a machine of stabilization. Work and marriage form a closed system designed to neutralize every excess intensity.

But the repressed returns — sometimes only as an almost imperceptible tremor. A glance. A hesitation. A timbre charged with signal-character. Antonelli’s roles embody precisely this disturbance. She plays maids and wives within ordered environments. Her presence suspends the functionality of the setting. Order itself begins to flicker.

For Bataille, the sacred never appears outside the world. The privileged site of transgression is not the cathedral, but the kitchen, the hallway, the doorframe, the shared lunch table, the accidental exchange of glances in everyday life. Transcendence emerges not beyond the profane, but as its overload.

The films of the commedia erotica all’italiana depict sexuality as an institutionalized disturbance within symbolic order. Patriarchal figures lose control without truly losing status or authority. The mask of bourgeois integrity barely slips. Yet the neurotic structure of order becomes visible.

The actual transgression often remains minimal. A conversation lasts one moment too long. A glance lingers. A remark reveals a hidden deficiency. Transgression exhausts itself in attention.

And this is precisely where these moments derive their psychic force.

Within highly codified environments, the slightest deviation is sufficient to release libidinal energy. Desire appears as a microscopic pressure discharge inside order itself.

During the nights of Acéphale, Bataille and Colette Peignot search for experiences in which the sovereign subject collapses and the sacred returns as shock. Bataille seeks the collapse of distance. Yet he still preserves this distance as chronicler, while Laure herself truly collapses.

Deconstruction of Bourgeois Bigotry

Within an environment structured by male dominance, the Laura-servant becomes the projection surface for every male member of the family — from the pubescent son to the aging patriarch. The films satisfy the gaze of the masses while simultaneously dissecting the psychopathology of that very gaze. In all her roles, Laura Antonelli appears as a melancholic, elegant, somnambulistic high priestess of bourgeois transgression. She performs with an almost complicit consent that exculpates the male desire to overwhelm her.

The thesis of complicit consent and the exculpation of male sexuality ultimately targets the gaze of the directors themselves. This gaze functions as a sophisticated system of absolution. It permits male sexuality to enact aggression, dominance, and instinctual force by constructing a female projection surface that legitimizes desire.

Order generates its own calculated tremors in order to discharge its hidden tensions under controlled conditions. This is why the films appear simultaneously transgressive and conservative. They permit a temporary destabilization of male control without touching its structural foundations.

What is striking is how strongly this mechanism resembles certain avant-garde models of transgression. In Bataille as well, woman frequently appears as the medium of a limit-experience philosophically framed by the male intellectual. The female figure bears intensity, risk, and embodiment, while the man organizes the symbolic order of the experience.

In every case, a form of curated dominance emerges.

The modern patriarch no longer rules primarily through prohibition and open authority. He appears sensitive, aestheticized, self-reflective, and anti-bourgeois. Yet precisely this refinement enables a subtler form of symbolic control. Female experience is no longer suppressed outright, but aesthetically processed, philosophically elevated, and culturally administered. Postmodernity has learned to transform the crisis of male order into an element of its own stabilization.